Here I discuss one such court challenge, a 35-page complaint in a Georgia federal court. The law and the complaint are in the complimentary package offered at the end of this post. (See The New Georgia Project et al. v. Raffensperger et al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.)
The New Law
Two sentences on page 4 of the new law make clear it was prompted by "The Big Lie" perpetrated by former President Donald J. Trump about the results of the 2020 general election. Here are those sentences:
- Following the 2018 and 2020 elections, there was a significant lack of confidence in Georgia election systems, with many electors concerned about allegations of rampant voter fraud.
- Many Georgia election processes were challenged in court, including the subjective signature-matching requirements, by Georgians on all sides of the political spectrum before and after the 2020 general election.
The plaintiffs are The New Georgia Project and two other entities. The defendants are Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and four other Georgia election officials. The plaintiffs allege that the new law violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and Section 2 of the U.S. Voting Rights Act. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of such violations and an injunction prohibiting the defendants from enforcing the challenged provisions.
The "Nature of the Case" section of the complaint consists of seven paragraphs. Here is the second paragraph of that section:
2. After the high-turnout general election [in 2020] officials conducted multiple recounts and audits. Supporters of former President Donald J. Trump filed several lawsuits seeking to overturn the general election's results, falsely alleging widespread fraud and misconduct on the part of election officials. No court in any of these lawsuits found support for these litigants' fanciful claims. After the senatorial runoff elections, Secretary [of State] Raffensperger declared in a nationally-televised interview that Georgia "had safe, secure, honest elections."
The complaint challenges many of the provisions of the new law. Here are some of those provisions:
- Despite nationwide scrutiny of Georgia's elections, which confirmed the absence of any fraud, insecurity, or wrongdoing, Republican members of the General Assembly passed legislation clearly intended to make it harder for lawful Georgia voters to participate in the state's elections.
- It will impose unjustifiable burdens disproportionately on the state's minority, young, poor, and disabled citizens.
- It will impose unnecessary and burdensome new identification requirements for absentee voting.
- It will unduly restrict the use of absentee drop boxes and bank mobile polling places.
- It will prohibit the state from distributing unsolicited absentee ballot applications.
- It will prohibit third parties—including voter engagement organizations—from collecting absentee ballot applications.
- It will burden voters with the risk of disenfranchisement due to meritless challenges that require an immediate defense of their qualifications.
- It will invalidate ballots cast by local voters before 5:00 p.m. in a precinct other than the one to which the voters were assigned, regardless of the reason or their inability to travel to another location.
- It will compress the time period for voting in a runoff election.
- It will ban any non-poll worker from giving food or drink, including water, to voters waiting in line.
The new law is a brazen attack on the voting rights of Georgians. The law was signed by the governor in a secret signing session attended by a few Republicans immediately after he received the bill. The secrecy of the signing session became a media sensation when State Representative Park Cannon of Atlanta, a Black woman and member of the Democratic minority in the legislature, knocked quietly on the governor's office door in an effort to witness the signing of the bill. She was arrested by state troopers and dragged kicking and screaming to jail.
The new law is an outright takeover of Georgia's election system by the legislature. It is clear that, if the election result in any county or precinct is disliked by the Republicans, they can take steps to alter the result to their liking.
It is my hope that the federal judge will grant the declaratory relief and the injunctive relief that the plaintiffs seek. I plan to report further developments.
I am offering a complimentary 133-page PDF consisting of the new Georgia election law (98 pages) and the complaint filed in federal court against the law (35 pages). Send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org and ask for the April 2021 package about the new election law in Georgia.